nelson's blog http://opensource.org/blog/6 en Open Source ECG http://opensource.org/node/379 Wow. Open Source comes to <a href="http://www.open-ecg-project.org/">medical instruments</a>. Of course, hewlett-packard makes great ECG hardware, but for western hospitals, price really isn't their concern. If you could drive the price down, that opens up better medicine to many many people. http://opensource.org/node/379#comments Fri, 05 Dec 2008 17:05:38 +0000 nelson 379 at http://opensource.org Open Source Data and an associated Open Source Data Definition http://opensource.org/node/378 <p>Andrew J. Turner (http://www.highearthorbit.com) suggested to me that we need a term for user-created, user-entered, user-discovered, and user-curated data. Of course, if you change "data" to "code" you have exactly what the Open Source Initiative is already doing for software. We could do the same thing for data. Write an Open Source Data Definition, which puts strictures on the attributes of data that claims to be Open Source Data.</p> <p><a href="http://opensource.org/node/378">read more</a></p> http://opensource.org/node/378#comments Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:06:05 +0000 nelson 378 at http://opensource.org SciPhone && Open Source http://opensource.org/node/370 <p><a href="http://www.dealextreme.com/details.dx/sku.13241">These guys (SciPhone)</a> really REALLY ought to get together with some open source developers. Looks like a great product, but it's almost 100% certain that their software stinks. Is it simply that they don't believe that hackers will come togther to write software for their hardware? Do they not know how to build such a community? Are they bound by contracts not to disclose programming information for the chips they've used? Do they not speak English well enough to make a difference in the Open Source creating part of the world?</p> <p><a href="http://opensource.org/node/370">read more</a></p> http://opensource.org/node/370#comments Fri, 31 Oct 2008 02:29:19 +0000 nelson 370 at http://opensource.org Defending Open Source http://opensource.org/node/362 <p><a href="http://opensource.org/node/362">read more</a></p> http://opensource.org/node/362#comments Mon, 18 Aug 2008 06:08:50 +0000 nelson 362 at http://opensource.org An obvious reason to use Open Source http://opensource.org/node/359 <p>Let's say that you want to build the highest building in your {village,town,county,state,country}. Your resources are limited, as they always are. Should you start building from the ground up? Or should you make use of the community foundation that Open Source developers have created? Your choice should be obvious. You may choose to build from the ground up, but your competitors are not likely to make that mistake.</p> http://opensource.org/node/359#comments Fri, 08 Aug 2008 12:32:54 +0000 nelson 359 at http://opensource.org Open Source is not about freedom, nor is it about licenses. http://opensource.org/node/358 <p><a href="http://opensource.org/node/358">read more</a></p> http://opensource.org/node/358#comments Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:29:45 +0000 nelson 358 at http://opensource.org tigers and elephants http://opensource.org/node/355 <p><a href="http://opensource.org/node/355">read more</a></p> http://opensource.org/node/355#comments Sat, 26 Jul 2008 19:41:11 +0000 nelson 355 at http://opensource.org Franchise http://opensource.org/node/346 <p>In a free market, over time, competition in the production of a commodity product will eliminate all profits. Bread-makers can sell their bread for enough money to cover the cost of the capital invested in the bakery, the cost of the flour, yeast, sugar, and water, the fuel needed for firing, and the salary of the baker. They can earn no more money than that. If they did, then another bakery would be established which would price its products lower, splitting that profit between the customer and the owner of the new bakery.</p><p><a href="http://opensource.org/node/346">read more</a></p> http://opensource.org/node/346#comments Mon, 07 Jul 2008 18:45:33 +0000 nelson 346 at http://opensource.org ''open-source fundamentalist''?? http://opensource.org/node/338 <p><a href="http://opensource.org/node/338">read more</a></p> http://opensource.org/node/338#comments Fri, 06 Jun 2008 04:47:08 +0000 nelson 338 at http://opensource.org Declare victory and go home http://opensource.org/node/335 Sometimes I want to declare victory and go home. Of course, that's usually an admission of defeat, but I really think that with news like <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/05/15/verizon_embraces_linux/">Verizon Embraces Linux</a>, that the penetration of Open Source into every sector of computer-using society (which would be ... everything) is inevitable. We've started the snowball down the hill, and there's no stopping it. Not that we would want to! But neither can the foes of Open Source stop it either. http://opensource.org/node/335#comments Thu, 15 May 2008 16:52:07 +0000 nelson 335 at http://opensource.org